Home Faculty meeting Union representing CSU faculty, CSU unable to negotiate contract – The Daily Aztec

Union representing CSU faculty, CSU unable to negotiate contract – The Daily Aztec

0


The Cal State System and the California Faculty Union clashed for 18 months, with the CFA saying the Chancellor’s team were steadfast in considering her proposals.

This article will continue to be updated with responses from CSU and CFA.

Hours before current faculty contracts expired at midnight, the California Faculty Association announced in an email to its members Thursday night that it had declared a dead end – the dead end – with the California State system. University, regarding negotiations for new faculty contracts.

The CFA is negotiating a general salary increase of 4% over three years, which would cost $ 90 million per year. The union stresses an increase in state funding and the consistency of the system to have its revenues greater than its expenses, in addition to a decrease in funding instructions.

CSU’s most recent counter-proposal, if accepted, would grant faculty a one-time increase of 2% for the next fiscal year. The CSU is also seeking to increase the price of parking, which the CFA alleges would ultimately thwart the increase it advocates and, in some cases, be more expensive.

“The two proposals combined could amount to a pay cut for some of our professors,” reads an update on CFA negotiations released Wednesday.

The statement follows Chancellor Joseph I. Castro’s visit to SF State, in which union members from across the campus community urged him to raise upcoming salaries for 10 presidents of the CSU, but not for faculty and staff.

“[Raising president salaries] addresses the long-standing fairness issues we face with our presidents, â€Castro said during his open forum with SF State on Tuesday. “We are currently undertaking similar efforts for our staff. “

“I’m willing to do the same with the faculty as well, and I believe it’s important for us to model fairness in all ways. So you have my word in terms of actions that will live up to our values, â€he added.

SF State Academic Senate President Teddy Albiniak, who moderated the campus forum, said the number of questions he received from the campus community about presidential salaries was a testament to his importance to the faculty.

“I think there are places where a more developed answer would have been appreciated,” he said, responding to Castro’s answer to questions. “And I don’t know if that’s because of the open forum’s kind of rushed time, or if it reflects the delicacy of the ongoing negotiations.”

The reasoning of the CSU for pushing presidential salary increases is to compete with the median market salaries of higher education executives, in order to retain administrators in those positions. A meeting of the CSU board of directors in July 2018 found that from 2012 to 2018, higher education salaries increased on average by almost 16%. Within CSU, CFA saw a 14% increase, while CSU executives saw a 9.4% increase.

In 2018, universities similar to the state of SF with high enrollment and operating expenses that conducted mid-range research had a median presidential salary of nearly $ 500,000. However, SF State and other similar CSUs had a median of $ 356,431.

The median salary for professors, including professors, associate professors and assistants, and lecturers, was $ 89,700.

Besides negotiating salary increases, the CFA has also made proposals regarding academic freedom, alternatives for university policing, course caps, guaranteed three-year contracts for coaches, increased parental leave and an appeal. more help with campus counseling.

The CFA cites the International Association of Counseling Services to advocate for more counselors on CSU campuses. The IACS recommends having one counselor for every 1,500 students.

Fourteen CSUs, including SF State, do not meet this recommendation.

From there, the California Public Employment Relations Board will review the stalemate statement. If it determines an impasse, the mediation process will begin.

In mediation, a neutral party will facilitate discussions between the CFA and the CSU, in addition to holding meetings with the individual parties, to help reach a voluntary agreement. The investigation will continue if mediation is unsuccessful.

The survey includes a panel of three people (a union representative, an employer representative, a neutral party) who listens to the presentations of both parties. The panel creates a non-binding report proposing resolutions based on its findings.

If the investigation fails, the CSU can impose its latest, best, and last offer on faculty. This step also suspends the non-strike clause for teachers.

The process, according to the CFA’s email, could take months.

“I don’t know if we will be forced to not have a contract. And then I think, really, it’s just going to be up to the CSU and the CFA – really, the CFA – to have to make a decision, â€said Mark Allan Davis, representative of the CFA Council for Racial and Social Justice and professor of ‘State SF. .

“It’s not going to be good, but who is it not going to be good for?” he said. “I’m just saying everyone, because CSU has all the money.”


LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here