Home Agenda LGBTQ Diary: 9th Circuit Upholds Washington State’s Ban on Conversion Therapy for Minors :: Bay Area Reporter

LGBTQ Diary: 9th Circuit Upholds Washington State’s Ban on Conversion Therapy for Minors :: Bay Area Reporter


A three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has unanimously upheld a Washington state law banning conversion therapy for minors.

The decision was released on September 6 and praised by Born Perfect, a project of the San Francisco-based National Center for Lesbian Rights. Equal Rights Washington, which intervened in the case to help the state attorney general defend the law, was represented by the NCLR, according to a news release.

In 2018, Washington banned licensed mental health professionals from subjecting young people to conversion therapy, which supporters say helps people who don’t want to be LGBTQ to recover. The practice, however, has been widely discredited and condemned by major medical organizations, including the American Medical Association. The American Psychiatric Association in 2018 issued an official statement encourage legislation prohibiting the practice on minors, among other findings. The same organization removed homosexuality from its list of mental illnesses in 1973.

Washington’s law is very similar to a law passed by California in 2012, the first in the country to do so. Opposed by Republicans, California Senate Bill 1172 was signed into law by then-Governor Jerry Brown, who said at the time, “This bill prohibits unscientific ‘therapies’ that have led young people to depression and suicide. These practices have no basis. in science or medicine and they will henceforth be relegated to the dustbin of quackery.”

California law challenged years ago

In December 2012, the California law was challenged by the Pacific Justice Institute, a “conservative legal defense organization specializing in the defense of religious liberty, parental rights, and other civil liberties,” according to the group’s website, on the grounds that it infringes on freedom of expression and religion. Judge William Schubb, who was appointed by President George HW Bush in 1990, ruled with challengers granting a preliminary injunction against the law. This however did not last long. The 9th Circuit ruled in favor of the state. In 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear two challenges to that decision, leaving the law standing.

Since then, 20 states and the District of Columbia have implemented laws banning conversion therapy for minors, and six others have implemented partial bans. Currently, three states — Alabama, Florida and Georgia — are “in a federal court circuit with a preliminary injunction currently preventing the conversion therapy bans from being enforced,” according to the Movement Enhancement Project, a think tank focused on on LGBTQ equality.

Washington State Law

Washington state enacted its law in 2018 but, three years later, it was challenged by conversion therapist Robert Tingley, saying it violated his and his clients’ rights to free speech and freedom of speech. religion.

Tingley “claimed that the state’s ban on conversion therapy by licensed practitioners chilled his speech and that he self-censored for fear of enforcement,” the Court House News Service reported September 6. . Tingley, according to the ruling, believes that the sex assigned to each person at birth is “a gift from God” that should not be changed and overrides an individual’s “feelings, determinations or wishes.” . »

The 9th Circuit panel – Justices Ronald Gould, Kim Wardlaw and Mark Bennett – rejected Tingley’s claim that a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision in National Institute of Family & Life Advocates v. . Becerra’s blocking enforcement of a California law that required faith pregnancy centers to inform clients about state-subsidized medical care, including abortion care, applied to her case. That ruling found that the law violated the First Amendment, by requiring center employees to speak contrary to their own beliefs.

The panel said Tingley “had standing to bring his claims as an individual and that the claims were prudentially mature. Tingley’s complaint showed a plan or desire to violate Washington law; Washington confirmed that he would enforce the ban on conversion therapy ‘as it enforces other restrictions on unprofessional conduct;’ and Tingley alleged that the law chilled his speech and that he self-censored for fear of being enforced. “

Tingley, however, had no right to represent the interests of his clients, the judges ruled, nor was he able to establish that the application of the law prevented his clients from having access to the information they wanted to hear.

“Tingley does not explain how a law that allows minors to seek conversion therapy from counselors practicing under the ‘auspices of a religious denomination’…denies its clients ‘access to the ideas they want. hear and counsel consistent with their own personal faith.'”

The fact that medical treatments are carried out by the spoken word “rather than by scalpel” does not negate the power of the state to regulate such treatments, the panel said.

In its 3-0 decision, the panel ultimately ruled: “Relying on all of the evidence before it as well as medical recommendations from expert organizations, the Washington legislature acted rationally in amending its regulatory regime for licensed healthcare providers to add ‘[p]performing conversion therapy on a patient under the age of eighteen” to the list of malpractices of health professions. »

NCLR welcomed the decision. Shannon Minter, a trans man who serves as the organization’s legal director, argued on behalf of Equal Rights Washington at the hearing in Tacoma, Washington last year, according to an NCLR statement.

“We are thrilled with today’s decision, which ensures that Washington’s vital law can continue to be enforced and that LGBTQ children in Washington will not be subjected to these discredited practices, which have been dismissed as dangerous by all major medical organizations in this country,” Minter said Sept. 6.

Mathew Shurka, co-founder of Born Perfect, the NCLR program that aims to end conversion therapy, said conversion therapy harms young people.

“Laws like Washington’s are essential to protect minors and parents from harm caused by unethical therapists who falsely claim they can prevent a child from being gay or transgender,” said Shurka, a male gay. “As a survivor of more than five years of conversion therapy, I know firsthand how harmful these practices are to young people and their families. The medical community has rejected these practices because they are harmful, ineffective and Being LGBTQ is not a mental health disorder. Trying to change such a fundamental aspect of a person’s identity is not only impossible, it’s deeply dangerous and causes serious and lasting harm.

Courts across the country have upheld similar laws in the 9th and 3rd Circuits and by federal district courts in Maryland, Florida and Illinois.

According to the NCLR, the only exception is a 2020 split decision by a panel of three 11th Circuit judges in Otto v. Boca Raton, which overturned a federal district court opinion upholding two Florida city ordinances that protected minors from conversion therapy. The 11th Circuit refused to rehear the case en banc (the entire circuit) earlier this year, despite strong dissenting opinions noting that the panel’s decision wrongly ignored the factual findings of the district court and misapplied the law of the first amendment.

Help keep the Bay Area Reporter going during these trying times. To support local, independent and LGBTQ journalism, consider become a member of the BAR.